on Trademark symbols: are they polluting beautyful logos? what’s the point?

I have seen an intriguing article by logodesignlove on polluted logos with trademark or services mark logos. And I can’t agree less.

I completely understand and the argument of visual pollution that occurs on the brand material at the expense of the security of cross-border legal rights of the brands (corporates in this case). But these logos go to places where brands might not even be aware of and these logos are their own only safeguard. They exists to remind the legally aware (or anyone with some self respect) that they just have to sit in front of the drawing board a bit longer. There can be set-ups offering completely different (see below this yogurt shop in Central London feeling Googlelish) or competitive services-(ie Goojje Google Knockoff Surfaces In China)

How Disney Targets a World Audience

Few days ago I had the chance to see most of the female protagonists (should i call them franchises?) of Disney at one post. The post itself was on the artistic quality of these drawings, but it allowed me to see how, unsurprisingly, articulate Disney has been with their story telling. How they brand their products to be more precise.

We were told before our Visual studies class that “This lecture will ruin your whole movie experience” so did this blog post.

A Streaming Apology – Netflix

Netflix segmented it’s product offering by Streaming & DVD (Qwickster), a move towards an anticipated direction.  Also make sure to have a look below on Netflix’s last take on ‘How to define what customers have been upset about.’.

In the video below the justification for this decision is explained from a ‘branding’ perspective, but there is more than that. This was the only way out for Netflix brand from a media-type that’s becoming more and more obsolete with innovations such as laptops without DVD player, or the adaptation of broadband internet usage. Instead of shutting down their business’s DVD arm (and upsetting their customer base), it separates itself from it trying to be more efficient in the fiercely competitive market of Streaming movies.

What will happen to Qwicster with their offering of posting DVD Movies and console games? They will stay in business until the media type (DVD) and the delivery method (postal) they advocate become obsolete.

User experience is the interface

 

When hard­wares are first build, they required highly pro­fi­cient oper­a­tors to be oper­ated by. These oper­a­tors were engi­neers who are highly trained and were able to speak the lan­guage of the hard­ware, which allowed them mas­ter the tech­nol­ogy. But as with many other things, civ­i­liza­tion (you can say cap­i­tal­ism as well) digests the tech­nol­ogy and enables the masses to opt-in. This is where the user inter­faces come in, as an inter­preter between the hard­ware and the user. The interface’s goal is to enable any­one to use a hard­ware to accom­plish cer­tain tasks, with­out requir­ing any prior expe­ri­ence with it.Dri­ven from this approach, brands as well as hard­wares, dimin­ished from their iden­ti­ties to user (cos­tumer) expe­ri­ences. The tan­gi­ble goods, user already pur­chased at the point of sale, is where you as the brand start become pas­sive, or a voice that sim­ply can be ignored within the arm­srace of media buying*.

Every inter­ac­tion that your con­sumer par­takes with your brand is a piece in the jig­saw, which will sum up to be their ‘User Expe­ri­ence ’ with your brand. This replaces (at least chal­langes) the idea of ‘set­ting up a tone’ or ‘a brand iden­tity’ with a bill­board. Invest­ing into your cus­tomers’ expe­ri­ence with your brand, is as sim­ple as pro­vid­ing a ‘worth men­tion­ing prod­uct & ser­vice’. The pos­si­bil­i­ties are only lim­ited to the extend you can afford to inter­act with your customers.
Afford: The fur­ther you com­mu­ni­cate any­thing to a cus­tomer with a brand on, you risk to break the frag­ile rela­tion­ship that you build up to date.

Irre­gard­less of the scale of the orga­ni­za­tion, or the field it oper­ates in (b2b, b2c), col­lec­tively built prod­uct is what the actual user inter­face is to the end user. This idea is as exten­sive as to the range of asso­ci­a­tions being made with the to the brand, logo, cus­tomer ser­vice, Pr stunts, ad cam­paigns, prod­uct itself, and so on… In order to have a solid brand cul­ture and royal base of cus­tomers, the cus­tomer inter­fac­ing oper­a­tions must be con­sis­tent & under micro­scopic observation.

Temporary Identity issues of an Ad-board

Coca Cola within Avis ad

The image above is of an ad-board taken at a near-central London location (I also came across more of the same board in central London as well). What caused this blog post/or the image of that board was; it made me think to myself that “Coca-Cola – Car hire deliveries – excuse me??”. I think this is simply because of the following;

  • The over powering colour play between white & red got my initial attention, therefore made me think of a brand/s that I am relatively more familiar with.
  • The way white is used across the bottom of the composition (Search for Coca-Cola stripe), concluded my presumption with the result “This ad must be about Coca – Cola”

Then,

I was able to brought my direct attention to the ad, and had to register the composition, see the ‘avis’ logo at the right bottom made me understand that Coca-Cola didn’t actually pay for this insertion.